Memoirs: So You Wanna Piece of Me?

Million Little Pieceswas the first addiction memoir I’ve ever read. Normally the entire genre makes me ill. All that self-absorption! Why on earth do you get to talk about how important your pain is when there are thousands of people who have other qualifications to write a memoir other than “I heart heroin.” I avoid abuse memoirs for the same reason. I find the whole thing sickening because as much as memorists “want to help others”, their books do nothing but provide a creative outlet for the memorist. It does nothing for the reader. Which is fine – not everything has to have a purpose in life. But I hate the coyness of that reason: “I wrote this book because I wanted others to know you could come through alcoholism/drug abuse/prostitution with flying colors!” Okay, whatever. Maybe others can and maybe they can’t, and maybe even the ones who can aren’t able to write, and that’s just fine.  So anytime I’m at B&N and I pick up something like Dry or whatever, I just read the back flap and think… dude, no.

Million Little Pieces triumphed over this bias.  Firstly, I loved the beautiful cover. A plaintive hand with tiny colorful beads on it against a green-blue cover said hope to me.  I bought the book. It would not be correct to say I read it.  I devoured this book.  I did not sleep until every word had been read.  I loved that book; it became part of my Permanent Library – the books that I will never get rid of, no matter what.  And not only do I love that book, I also love James Frey.  Even after Oprah threw his junkie ass under the bus, I continue to love him. I will read anything he publishes for as long as he writes – his writing covers all sins.

Still, in some circles he’s a pariah. A liar. Almost in the realm of a plagiarist. I never understood that. The man created something beautiful and meaningful. Whether or not everything in there was the dog’s honest truth, I don’t know or care. It wasn’t a biography; it was a memoir. If I ever write my memoir, it will probably be vastly different from other people’s memories of the time. It brings up the whole Roshoman debate: is my version “correct”, or is yours? And my answer is: mine is. Because I’m the one writing it. You want to write your version, have at it. But my life is forever marked with my own perceptions, and my own exaggerations, lies, half-truths, secrets, and all the other things that made people freak out when they discovered Frey’s work was in fact not 100% literal. (But make no mistake: it was literary.) The specific parts of his work that were attacked were the dental scene and his arrest. On the Oprah show, Nan Talese, the publisher, defended her author’s work by saying that no, the dental scene did not bring up any doubts for her because she too had once experienced dental work without any anesthetic. And Oprah said (I’m paraphrasing here), that’s ridiculous, Nan. People just don’t have dental surgery without anesthetic.That made me stand up and take notice. What if Talese had simply said, Oprah, black women do not become billionaires. Sorry, it’s never happened before, so it didn’t happen to you.Same exact set of facts: each personally experienced something unusual. But the O negated both Nan and James’s experience. Bullocks on that. I really don’t give a wet noodle if he had oral surgery without drugs or not. It doesn’t take away from the thrust of the story. And as for his arrest, yes, he apparently exaggerated. But so what? It works.

After initially supporting Frey, Oprah turned on Frey with a vengeance, telling her audience that “truth matters.” Maybe it does. But this wasn’t a confessional, it was a piece of art. And art is wide open to interpretation, and Frey had the right – the dog given right – to use his very brief jail time to make a larger point.  Maybe he felt like a criminal and used the symbol of prison to further that. Or maybe he just thought he looked good in a prison jumpsuit.  Point is, its not relevant to the story and despite what Oprah says, it has no bearing on James Frey the author or the man.

Memory is a tricky thing.  As an artist, Frey – and everyone else – has the right to write what they know in this regard.  It’s up to you and me to decide if we want to read it.   In normal cases, I’d say no.  But James Frey is one of the best literary voices of our generation, and I’d read anything he cares to publish.  His vision and his skill are the truth.  One simply can’t fake that.

About these ads

Comments

  1. Ms. Aloha says:

    Right on the money, honey. I couldn’t have said it better myself! I lost all respect for O when she rolled Frey under the bus. I used those exact words when I saw that happening. It bothers me that O can make or break someone. On her confession show she also made a handicapped girl confess that she was hung over when she crashed her car. That was cruel.. just cruel.

  2. caraellison says:

    Whoa, I didn’t hear about the handicapped girl issue. That is just awful.

    One must admire her power, but I don’t find her particularly interesting or even a force for good in the world.

    I think she’s basically a self-absorbed twit.

  3. Why on earth would it be wrong to get the girl to admit she was drunk?
    Having two cousins who were killed by drunk drivers in seperate accidents, seeing how my aunt’s life was destroyed with grief, seeing 3 little boys grow up with no mother and a permanently disabled father, I don’t see the problem in getting the self-absorbed girl to own up to her act.

  4. Mary says:

    I don’t understand why someone would fake a memoir. Why not just call it a fictional memoir? If the author has a great talent why would they jepordize their credibility?

    I just finished a wonderful “authentic” memoir called, “Nub, Story of an Ex-Cripple” by Emile Barrios. I don’t think I would have been as inspiried by this story if it had been fiction. Real life ismore inspiring. You can find the book/author at http://www.emilebarrios.com.

    That’s my two cents!

  5. caraellison says:

    Mary,

    Are you the author? Since you gave the web address as your own, I’m not quite sure.

  6. Danielle says:

    I think you may well be missing the point! It is a great piece of writing, no doubt about it. But why not just say it was fiction? As this is often what fiction writers do – use parts of their life and fictionalise them. Could it be that it was published as truth because that would sell better and make more money? Of couse! and THIS is where he was wrong.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,243 other followers

%d bloggers like this: